[packagers] amavisd-new question

[Quien Sabe]

Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Quien Sabe wrote:
>
>   
>> are the two utilities referenced at the bottom of this link
>>
>> http://www.engardelinux.org/modules/index/list_archives.cgi?list=amavis&page=0047.html&month=2007-10
>>
>> excluded on purpose or simple oversight?
>>     
>
> Oversight due to too high workload. Ralph reported it earlier and it
> slipped my mind when I updated amavisd-new around newyear. I have now
> fixed it and will be available later today.
>
> PS Maybe we should look at ways to make the process a bit easier for
> reported problems to find their way into subversion. I am open to change
> the way we work (while we wait for rpmrepo).
>
>   
The only suggestion that comes to mind is some sort of a shared "bug" or 
"todo" list. That would allow
less active and/or less experienced packagers pick at some of the low 
hanging fruit.

Jim