Todd Lyons wrote: > Gah. Ignore me. I'm complaining about a CentOS package, not a dag > package. My profuse apologies... So, whats the problem with the CentOS package ? btw, http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/ 3.1.9-1.el5 is now available. - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq