[users] Dropping the repotag
Andreas Rogge
a.rogge at solvention.de
Sun Mar 18 14:11:23 CET 2007
First of all: yes, you're right.
But we will face this issue with EPEL. A repotag will not help to blame
EPEL when something breaks (they don't have one). It will only help to
blame RPMForge (as RPMforge has one).
I don't think repotags should be dropped because they suck. I just think
that they're a workaround for broken/incomplete tools and have been in
place for too long. Hell, neither rpm nor yum nor anything else actually
knows there is something like a repotag. They just display it because we
hijack the package signature.
People will need better tools anyway, because nobody will be able to
tell the difference between an EPEL and a base distro package. I think
yum should actually tell you vendor and distro on all packages.
We already had similar issues on x86_64 where you couldn't tell the
difference between i386 and x86_64 packages. Today yum reports every
package with its arch.
--
Solvention systems management
Egermannstr. 6-8
53359 Rheinbach
Tel: +49 2226 158179-0
Fax: +49 2226 158179-9
http://www.solvention.de
mailto:info at solvention.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3219 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20070318/00168642/smime.bin
More information about the users
mailing list