[users] proper SRPMS to use?
Bill McGonigle
bill at bfccomputing.com
Thu Feb 21 19:17:58 CET 2008
On Feb 21, 2008, at 12:50, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
> Looking at http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/perl-MIME-tools/
> there are non-test versions, yes.
True. So, to elaborate, through yum updates I had:
perl-MIME-tools-5.425-1.fc7.rf
on my system. RPM tells me that it requires perl(File::Temp), but I
don't see that requirement in the current .spec, which confused me.
Because perl on f8 includes File::Temp now, without a Provides/
Obsoletes for perl-File-Temp, I was having trouble doing an upgrade,
because perl-MIME-tools wasn't seeing its dependency satisfied.
So, I wound up rebuilding the same version of perl-MIME-tools (from
the -test SRPM) as I had installed, building a copy of perl with a
Provides/Obsoletes for perl-File-Temp (patch sent in), and packing
them into a transaction together to get over that hurdle. I think I
should be able to downgrade to the release version of perl from there.
So, I think my immediate problem is solved, but I'm still uncertain
about how the version that yum updates gave me corresponds to a -test
version off of the website. I thought the answer I saw in the
archives is that the real current SRPM is in SVN, which made some
sense on the versions not lining up, but then the question still
remains how to get to that SRPM.
-Bill
-----
Bill McGonigle, Owner Work: 603.448.4440
BFC Computing, LLC Home: 603.448.1668
bill at bfccomputing.com Cell: 603.252.2606
http://www.bfccomputing.com/ Page: 603.442.1833
Blog: http://blog.bfccomputing.com/
VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf
More information about the users
mailing list