[users] apt.sw.be looks dead from the UK and US

[Karanbir Singh]

Bill McGonigle wrote:
> For the future, would it make sense to point the mirrorlist locally by
> default, and then rev. the -release package when there was a change to
> the list?
> 
> If that's not a good idea, one of us with an account on a big managed
> server farm (e.g. Yahoo!) could volunteer to host the mirrorlist file -
> it's small enough.  The theory there being that it wouldn't be impacted
> by a single hardware incident, at least not for too long.

I am presently working with Dag on this issue - with the aim being to
have a slightly more robust apt.sw.be setup in place.

- KB
-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq