[users] Metadata broken for *at least* rh9

[Karanbir Singh]

Dag, thanks for the clarification.

Dag Wieers wrote:
> So either I do not provide repomd metadata, or I provide the one I 
> provide now. Nobody complained, there is nothing wrong with it except if 
> you _want_ to use repomd format with yum on RH9 or older.

I think we can safely ignore people using RH9 these days. its EOL'd long 
enough to not really merit much effort being put into supporting it.

> Or in the case of this bugreport someone who wants to use the RH9 
> repository with his FC9 distribution. *sigh*

These ones we might need to consider. I guess its just a case of 
$releasever getting in the way then.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522219 at icq